[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
|
| |
Same-sex "Marriage"
The Case for Marriage
The Case Against Counterfeiting Marriage
Some congressional and state elected officials are saying a
constitutional marriage amendment isn't needed.
Their conclusion is a packaged political statement -- "We already have one
man one woman marriage laws in place, we don't need anything else." It
is true, we have one man one woman laws in place. However, the issue is
not whether we have existing laws, but "what kind of laws do we
have?"
Both federal and state Defense of Marriage Laws (D.O.M.A.) are
statutory laws. In the hierarchy of laws we have Federal Constitution
Law; then, Federal Statutory Law; then, State Constitution Law; then,
State Statutory Law.
The problem we are facing is that renegade judicial activists are
attacking the vulnerable statutory laws! What is needed is a
strengthened law and one that is less likely to be attacked by these
runaway judges and courts. A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT answers the
dilemma!
Bill Wheeler, Executive Director
Families First
|
|
|
